![]() 05/07/2016 at 11:52 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Want to replace the rear speakers on a regular cab GMT400? Time to remove half the interior and make you buy a T45 (or T47, I can’t quite tell) bit because of course. I guess I’m not having lunch anywhere other than McDonalds after all.
![]() 05/07/2016 at 12:27 |
|
When it comes to interiors, GM is like that kid that refuses to ask for help, but really should ask for help. I despise doing anything that involves taking apart the interior of the Blazer
![]() 05/07/2016 at 12:29 |
|
It sucks, but I’ve already got it half-disassembled, so I might as well spend the $10 on torx bits.
![]() 05/07/2016 at 12:31 |
|
I don't understand how 80s and 90s GM products wound up with torx fasteners
![]() 05/07/2016 at 12:34 |
|
Because in the 80s and 90s, very few home mechanics had Torx fasteners, so this was a method of having to get it dealer-serviced for some things.
![]() 05/07/2016 at 12:35 |
|
Wow that's shitty of them, but it makes sense
![]() 05/07/2016 at 12:40 |
|
Trust me, it isn't just GM that uses torx for interior components. BMW uses them too and I think I've seen a few in the Fusion too.
![]() 05/07/2016 at 12:42 |
|
Yeah, it’s just that GM uses Torx fasteners on the weirdest things and in the weirdest sizes.
![]() 05/07/2016 at 12:44 |
|
Also, since they’re seatbelt anchors, I have a couple of questions.
1: Why is the bolt metal but the bracket plastic?
2: Why the hell didn’t they go all the way to a T-50?
![]() 05/07/2016 at 13:27 |
|
1. I imagine that has something to do with wanting the bracket to break before something else that’s more expensive to replace, maybe?
2. The same reason for using torx at all, I assume. T50 is probably easier to find than T47. Also the same reason BMW uses 7mm bolts for some things
![]() 05/07/2016 at 13:32 |
|
Alternate reason for both - they were probably high
![]() 05/07/2016 at 13:34 |
|
Yup.
![]() 05/07/2016 at 13:35 |
|
Fair enough.